NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Location
Canada1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Short, Margaret A.; Fincher, George N. – Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1983
Development of a screening tool for detecting developmental disabilities and at-risk conditions in younger children is described. Data obtained from this tool are correlated with two other widely used screening instruments. Future research should continue to explore the interrelationship of items on screening instruments to obtain valid and…
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Diagnostic Tests, Learning Disabilities, Preschool Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pirner, Phyllis A. – Journal of Extension, 1981
This project makes training and technical help available to communities to screen preschool children, locate high-risk children, and direct families to existing services or develop local community services for handicapped children and their families. It provides participating families with information on childhood development and the need to…
Descriptors: Community Education, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Mardell-Czudnowski, Carol; And Others – Canadian Journal for Exceptional Children, 1987
Thirty French-speaking Quebec preschoolers were administered translated versions of the Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning-Revised (DIAL-R) and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Discussion focuses on aspects of translation and content requiring further modification, and on issues regarding use of translated…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Foreign Countries, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glascoe, Frances P.; And Others – Pediatrics, 1990
To help physicians select appropriate screening tests for early childhood identification of developmental disabilities, 19 screening tests were administered by a pediatrician and rated by a panel of pediatricians and a special educator. Five of the tests were identified that approached standards for educational and psychological tests. (TJH)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Developmental Disabilities, Diagnostic Tests, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hutchins-Hewlett, Elizabeth J. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1982
The reasons for using tests in early childhood programs are (1) to increase teachers' confidence in their role performance; (2) to explain and defend early childhood programs; (3) to promote consistency across programs; (4) to provide curriculum and instruction guidance to teachers; and (5) to focus teachers and parents on the more measurable…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Paget, Kathleen D.; Nagle, Richard J. – School Psychology Review, 1986
An ecologically-based model is offered to guide the assessment activities of school psychologists at the preschool level. The uniqueness of the preschool population, the multidimensional structure of the assessment process, and the connection between assessment results and the intervention strategies are emphasized. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Ecological Factors, Environmental Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reynolds, Cecil R. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1979
The last decade has seen an increase of interest in early identification of children with potential learning and behavior problems. In the present report, the purposes of early screening are delineated and selected arguments against preschool identification and intervention programs described. Arguments favoring the early screening of preschoolers…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Evaluation Needs, Identification, Labeling (of Persons)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feeney, Jennifer; Bernthal, John – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1996
The validity of using the Revised Denver Developmental Screening Test (RDDST) was investigated by testing 199 preschool children (ages 3-4) and reviewing the results 6 months later. Results indicated that the RDDST was an efficient prognostic tool in predicting formal assessment results for children at risk for language impairments. (CR)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Efficiency, Evaluation Methods, High Risk Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kochanek, Thomas T.; Hennen, Florence – Special Services in the Schools, 1988
Two measures used for early detection of learning problems (Preschool Screening System and Denver Articulation Screening Exam) were tested for their predictive validity. Educational placement at the end of grade one was examined and compared to pre-kindergarten test scores on the two measures. Analysis found both measures to be valid. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Early Identification, Followup Studies, Kindergarten
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Poth, Rita L.; Barnett, David W. – School Psychology Review, 1988
The Learning Accomplishment Profile-Diagnostic Edition and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales were subjected to multitrait-multimethod analysis with 40 randomly selected preschoolers. Difficulties in the areas of convergent validity and profile interpretations of functioning were found. (TJH)
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Child Development, Diagnostic Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hrncir, Elizabeth, J; Eisenhart, Corinne E. – Young Children, 1991
Aims to foster scrupulous use of the "at-risk" label for young children by advocating clarification of the term. Proposes caveats educators should consider before applying the label. Among these are (1) risk is not static; (2) standardized test scores are not effective predictors of risk for young children; and (3) children develop in an…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Diagnostic Tests, Early Childhood Education, Ecological Factors