Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 8 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 24 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 39 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 39 |
Descriptor
Researchers | 38 |
Foreign Countries | 20 |
Evaluation Methods | 10 |
Financial Support | 9 |
Scientific Research | 9 |
Bibliometrics | 8 |
Peer Evaluation | 8 |
College Faculty | 6 |
Productivity | 6 |
Research | 6 |
Cooperation | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Evaluation | 39 |
Author
Aboal, Diego | 1 |
Abramo, Giovanni | 1 |
Abrizah, Abdullah | 1 |
Alesia A. Zuccala | 1 |
Alessandra Zimmermann | 1 |
Amaral, Livio | 1 |
Arasu, Prema | 1 |
Bautista-Puig, Núria | 1 |
Benson, John | 1 |
Bonaccorsi, Andrea | 1 |
Bornmann, Lutz | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 39 |
Reports - Research | 33 |
Information Analyses | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 12 |
Postsecondary Education | 9 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kulikowski, Konrad; Przytula, Sylwia; Sulkowski, Lukasz – Research Evaluation, 2023
In this article, we focused on the nature of the relationship between research evaluation systems that are based on metrics and those that are based on a critical comprehensive judgment of scientific content with researchers' burnout and work engagement. The research was conducted on a sample of 1,191 Polish researchers in the context of a highly…
Descriptors: Researchers, Burnout, Foreign Countries, Evaluation
Simon Turner – Research Evaluation, 2025
The pandemic represented a context where rapid changes to planning, organization and service delivery were undertaken to respond to an urgent and life-threatening health system problem. There was intense interest in knowledge mobilization--mechanisms that allow the timely sharing of evidence with the aim of supporting improvement--to mitigate the…
Descriptors: Communities of Practice, COVID-19, Pandemics, Public Health
Osório, António; Bornmann, Lutz – Research Evaluation, 2022
Research groups spend time and resources in the process of applying for funding. This issue raises important questions regarding inefficiency and whether the currently used funding mechanisms are adequate. This article aims to identify ways of reducing the inefficiency and the waste of resources when making research funding calls. We look at four…
Descriptors: Financial Support, Efficiency, Productivity, Researchers
Feenstra, Ramón A.; Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio – Research Evaluation, 2023
The use of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation has a series of complex impacts on academic inquiry. These systems have gradually spread into a wide range of locations and disciplines, including the humanities. The aim of this study is to examine their effects as perceived by philosophy and ethics researchers in Spain, a country where…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Bibliometrics, Philosophy, Ethics
Gemma Elizabeth Derrick; Alessandra Zimmermann; Helen Greaves; Jonathan Best; Richard Klavans – Research Evaluation, 2023
Previous studies of the use of peer review for the allocation of competitive funding agencies have concentrated on questions of efficiency and how to make the 'best' decision, by ensuring that successful applicants are also the more productive or visible in the long term. This paper examines the components of feedback received from an unsuccessful…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Researchers, Peer Evaluation, Grants
D'Onofrio, María Guillermina; Rogers, Juan D. – Research Evaluation, 2022
The evaluation system is an important component of the institutional arrangements that may shape the career trajectories of researchers. Using logistic regression and recursive partition models, we analyze the resulting key individual level factors that seem to play an important role in the promotion of researchers through the research evaluation…
Descriptors: Research, Researchers, Foreign Countries, Molecular Biology
Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea – Research Evaluation, 2023
The study of national research assessment exercises serves to evaluate the effectiveness of policies versus their objectives and to improve the formulation of future initiatives. The aim of the current study is to verify whether the introduction of the first performance-based research funding in Italy, based on the 2004-10 VQR assessment, achieved…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Performance Based Assessment, International Cooperation, Researchers
Leigh, Jennifer; Brown, Nicole – Research Evaluation, 2021
This article reports on a study that followed up on an initial interdisciplinary project and focused specifically on the experiences of researchers involved in practice-based interdisciplinary research. We share an approach to research evaluation that focuses on the experiences of those conducting the research rather than the outputs. The study…
Descriptors: Researchers, Interdisciplinary Approach, Experience, Research Methodology
Jamie Shaw – Research Evaluation, 2024
There has been a recent increase in attention toward the proper targets of evaluation in science funding policy. Specifically, some claim that we should 'fund people, not projects' to allow for increased autonomy for researchers. Critics argue that this movement unduly opens room for biases against several marginalized groups of scientists. In…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Grants, Financial Support, Researchers
Higgins, Linden E.; Smith, Julia M. – Research Evaluation, 2022
In 2015, a multidisciplinary group of academic researchers and extension personnel was awarded a US Department of Agriculture Coordinated Agricultural Project grant. The team's goal was to understand human decision-making in the context of potential livestock disease outbreaks, investigating the impediments to increased adoption of biosecurity…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Cooperation, Extension Agents, Researchers
Marta Natalia Wróblewska; Corina Balaban; Gemma Derrick; Paul Benneworth – Research Evaluation, 2024
It has been argued that due to the growing importance attributed to research impact and forms of its evaluation, an academic 'culture of impact' is emerging. It would include certain concepts, values, and skills related to the area of generating and documenting impact. We use thematic and discourse analysis to analyse open answers from 100…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Researchers, Humanities, Social Sciences
Dewaele, Alexis; Vandael, Kristof; Meysman, Stefan; Buysse, Ann – Research Evaluation, 2021
The number and type of collaborations between researchers and stakeholders has increased significantly. This responds to the demand from policymakers, funders, and citizens that researchers should help to tackle important social issues (e.g. climate change, healthy aging). However, there is little knowledge about how collaboration processes are…
Descriptors: Interaction, Social Science Research, Humanities, Researchers
O'Donovan, Cian; Michalec, Aleksandra; Moon, Joshua R. – Research Evaluation, 2022
Problems framed as societal challenges have provided fresh impetus for transdisciplinary research. In response, funders have started programmes aimed at increasing transdisciplinary research capacity. However, current programme evaluations do not adequately measure the skills and characteristics of individuals and collectives doing this research.…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Research Methodology, Researchers, Evaluation Methods
SSH Researchers Make an Impact Differently. Looking at Public Research from the Perspective of Users
Bonaccorsi, Andrea; Chiarello, Filippo; Fantoni, Gualtiero – Research Evaluation, 2021
With the rise of the impact assessment revolution, governments and public opinion have started to ask researchers to give evidence of their impact outside the traditional audiences, i.e. students and researchers. There is a mismatch between the request to demonstrate the impact and the current methodologies for impact assessment. This mismatch is…
Descriptors: Humanities, Social Science Research, Researchers, Users (Information)
Razmgir, Maryam; Panahi, Sirous; Ghalichi, Leila; Mousavi, Seyed Ali Javad; Sedghi, Shahram – Research Evaluation, 2021
This article explores the models and frameworks developed on "research impact'. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of related literature through scoping study method. The present research investigates the nature, objectives, approaches, and other main attributes of the research impact models. It examines to analyze and classify models…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Models, Evaluation Methods, Classification