Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Goal Orientation | 1 |
| Growth Models | 1 |
| Job Performance | 1 |
| Observation | 1 |
| Position Papers | 1 |
| Power Structure | 1 |
| Professional Development | 1 |
| Psychological Needs | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education Policy Analysis… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Hawaii | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textFord, Timothy G.; Hewitt, Kim Kappler – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2020
In current teacher evaluation systems, the two main purposes of evaluation--accountability/goal accomplishment (summative) and professional growth/improvement (formative)--are often at odds with one another. However, they are not only compatible, but linking them within a unified teacher evaluation system may, in fact, be desirable. The challenge…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, Accountability
