NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cleary, Anne M.; Claxton, Alexander B. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
This study shows that the presence of a tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) state--the sense that a word is in memory when its retrieval fails--is used as a heuristic for inferring that an inaccessible word has characteristics that are consistent with greater word perceptibility. When reporting a TOT state, people judged an unretrieved word as more likely to…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Heuristics, Metacognition, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morishima, Yasunori – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
For native (L1) comprehenders, lower-level language processes such as lexical access and parsing are considered to consume few cognitive resources. In contrast, these processes pose considerable demands for second-language (L2) comprehenders. Two reading-time experiments employing inconsistency detection found that English learners did not detect…
Descriptors: Native Language, Second Language Learning, Cognitive Processes, Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Uffmann, Christian – Language Sciences, 2007
This paper argues against the view of intrusive [r] as a synchronically arbitrary insertion process. Instead, it is seen as a phonologically natural process, which can be modelled within the framework of Optimality Theory (OT). Insertion of [r] in phonologically restricted environments is a consequence of a more general theory of consonant…
Descriptors: Generative Grammar, Phonemes, Universities, Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Newman, Rochelle S.; German, Diane J. – Language and Speech, 2005
This study investigated how lexical access in naming tasks (picture naming, naming to open-ended sentences, and naming to category exemplars) might be influenced by different lexical factors during adolescence and adulthood. Participants included 1075 individuals, ranging in age from 12 to 83 years. Lexical factors examined included word frequency…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Language Processing, Age Differences, Adolescents