NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Levy, Daniel – Vestes, 1980
After a comparison of institutional autonomy and government influence patterns in Australian and United States higher education institutions, it is concluded that variety in balances is possible and does exist. These balances can be altered to suit state needs and also free independent institutions for their own purposes. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accountability, Comparative Education, Government School Relationship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meek, V. Lynn – Higher Education, 1991
In Australia, higher education policy changes are being initiated by a federal government without legislative control over state institutions. Although the federal government wishes to see a more diverse system and claims to be de-bureaucratizing the system, its policies encourage imitation of elite universities and appear to be centralizing…
Descriptors: Centralization, Change Strategies, Educational Change, Educational Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lourens, Roy – Vestes, 1985
The so-called binary system of postsecondary education in Australia, a subject of recent criticism, is found to be less a matter of concern than the related funding issues and concern for equitable support of all sectors. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, College Role, Educational Finance, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Puplick, C. J. – Vestes, 1985
The simple abolition of university fees in Australia has failed to meet its stated objective of equalizing access to higher education and should be reinstated, with financial assistance available to qualified students unable to pay. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Educational Economics, Educational Finance, Equal Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Knight, John – Australian Universities' Review, 1994
The provisions in Australia's 1993 Higher Education Budget Statement regarding equity, diversity, and educational quality are examined. The discussion draws on current models of governance of public and private systems to examine ways in which the federal government has imposed accountability mechanisms on institutions. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Accountability, Budgets, Cultural Pluralism