Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
Trainer, James F. | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reference Materials -… | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Trainer, James F. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2008
In this age of accountability, transparency, and accreditation, colleges and universities increasingly conduct comparative analyses and engage in benchmarking activities. Meant to inform institutional planning and decision making, comparative analyses and benchmarking are employed to let stakeholders know how an institution stacks up against its…
Descriptors: College Planning, Institutional Research, Comparative Analysis, Benchmarking

Trainer, James F. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Organizations, programs, and other resources for data sharing in higher education are listed and described, with addresses provided. They include existing data-exchange programs and consortia, survey programs and databases, and a list of papers presented at the 35th Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. (MSE)
Descriptors: Consortia, Databases, Higher Education, Information Services

Trainer, James F. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
Before joining a data-sharing consortium, colleges and universities must address issues regarding goals and expectations, including why comparative data are needed, information types needed, needed comparisons, selection of institutions for comparison, data accessibility, time requirements, costs, and need for technical expertise. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Comparative Analysis, Consortia, Costs

Trainer, James F. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
A set of general policies or ground rules is desirable for colleges and universities planning to participate in both basic and more complex data exchanges with other institutions. Participation in data exchange is enhanced by well-defined and comparable institutional memberships, clear organizational objectives and data, high-quality and timely…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Consortia, Data, Group Membership