Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Auditory Tests | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Attention Control | 1 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Hearing (Physiology) | 1 |
| Hearing Impairments | 1 |
| Imitation | 1 |
| Maturity (Individuals) | 1 |
| Phonemics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Boothroyd, Arthur | 2 |
| Eisenberg, Laurie S. | 1 |
| Mackersie, Carol L. | 1 |
| Martinez, Amy S. | 1 |
| Prida, Tammy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBoothroyd, Arthur; Eisenberg, Laurie S.; Martinez, Amy S. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2010
Purpose: The goal was to assess the effects of maturation and phonological development on performance, by normally hearing children, on an imitative test of auditory capacity (On-Line Imitative Test of Speech-Pattern Contrast Perception [OlimSpac]; Boothroyd, Eisenberg, & Martinez, 2006; Eisenberg, Martinez, & Boothroyd, 2003, 2007). Method:…
Descriptors: Children, Hearing (Physiology), Maturity (Individuals), Phonology
Peer reviewedMackersie, Carol L.; Boothroyd, Arthur; Prida, Tammy – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2000
This study examined whether a divided-attention, sentence recall task was more sensitive to distortion of the speech signal than a conventional focused-attention task with 18 normal hearing listeners. The study concluded that the simultaneous-sentence test, in its present form, is not more sensitive to the effects of peak clipping than is a…
Descriptors: Adults, Attention Control, Auditory Tests, Hearing Impairments
