Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Factor Analysis | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Inferences | 1 |
Item Response Theory | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Anderson, Daniel | 2 |
Tindal, Gerald | 2 |
Farley, Dan | 1 |
Kahn, Joshua D. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson, Daniel; Kahn, Joshua D.; Tindal, Gerald – Applied Measurement in Education, 2017
Unidimensionality and local independence are two common assumptions of item response theory. The former implies that all items measure a common latent trait, while the latter implies that responses are independent, conditional on respondents' location on the latent trait. Yet, few tests are truly unidimensional. Unmodeled dimensions may result in…
Descriptors: Robustness (Statistics), Item Response Theory, Mathematics Tests, Grade 6
Anderson, Daniel; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – Journal of Special Education, 2015
Students with significant cognitive disabilities present an assessment dilemma that centers on access and validity in large-scale testing programs. Typically, access is improved by eliminating construct-irrelevant barriers, while validity is improved, in part, through test standardization. In this article, one state's alternate assessment data…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests