Descriptor
| Academic Freedom | 1 |
| College Environment | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Institutional Autonomy | 1 |
| Law Schools | 1 |
| Law Students | 1 |
| School Law | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
Source
| Wests's Education Law… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Weinberger, Harold; Schepard, Andrew – Wests's Education Law Quarterly, 1993
Reviews a case that vindicates the principle of judicial noninterference in academic evaluation of students. Describes the strategy of the lawyers who represented the academic institution. Discusses alternative approaches for serving the competing values at stake in grading decisions. (52 footnotes) (MLF)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Environment, Court Litigation, Grading
