NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Villarroel, Verónica; Bloxham, Susan; Bruna, Daniela; Bruna, Carola; Herrera-Seda, Constanza – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Authenticity has been identified as a key characteristic of assessment design which promotes learning. Authentic assessment aims to replicate the tasks and performance standards typically found in the world of work, and has been found to have a positive impact on student learning, autonomy, motivation, self-regulation and metacognition; abilities…
Descriptors: Performance Based Assessment, Barriers, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karami, Sareh; Ghahremani, Mehdi; Parra-Martinez, Fabio Andres; Gentry, Marcia – Roeper Review, 2020
No consensus on a definition of wisdom exists. Hence, 50 articles were systematically reviewed from the fields of psychology, management and leadership, and education to examine points of consensus among conceptions of wisdom. These articles were limited to the most cited peer-reviewed articles published between 2006 and 2018 that include wisdom…
Descriptors: Journal Articles, Psychological Studies, Educational Research, Administration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cottone, R. Rocco – Journal of Counseling & Development, 2001
Examines social constructivism as an intellectual movement in the mental health field that directs a social consensual interpretation of reality. Presents a social constructivism approach to counseling which redefines the ethical decision-making process as an interactive rather than individual or intrapsychic process. Explores how the process…
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Counseling, Counseling Theories, Decision Making
Paulston, Rolland G. – 1979
Theories or explanations of educational evaluation are discussed and categorized under two broad methodological headings, the objectivist and subjectivist epistemological orientations. They can be seen as potentially complementary empirical approaches that offer evaluators two methodological orientations to assess educational-reform outcomes.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Educational Policy
Himes, Kenneth G. – 1983
Debate paradigms, which at one time established standards to help judges evaluate arguments and rules to guide debaters' argument choice and strategy selection, no longer offer consistent guidance for either judges or debaters. An increased emphasis on creativity and flexibility has led to a general unwillingness to use a rigid debate format. The…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Communication Skills, Debate, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morehead, David R.; Rouse, William B. – Information Processing and Management, 1985
Presents results of five experiments on human information-seeking behavior in different online information-seeking environments which studied search strategies and assessed information value in realistic search environments. A conceptual model of how humans value information is presented. Empirical and modeling results are considered for…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Databases, Design Requirements, Evaluative Thinking
Priest, Simon – Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 1990
Outdoor leaders with sound judgment can gather many specific experiences, induce them into a collection of general concepts, store these as memory maps in the mind, later recall the general concepts as needed, and deduce a specific prediction from them. Proposes that evaluative reflection after a judgment is made is the component missing from most…
Descriptors: Adventure Education, Cognitive Processes, Decision Making, Deduction
Fadely, Dean – 1982
College debaters who go to law school are often surprised by the differences between the processes that take place in the court of reason and the process that takes place in the court of law. The court of reason relies mainly on authoritative testimony, while the court of law relies on direct evidence. Evidence in the court of reason is either…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation, Court Role, Debate
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Witherell, Carol S.; Edwards, Carolyn Pope – Journal of Moral Education, 1991
Suggests that attempts to segregate social-conventional reasoning from the moral domain may represent an artificial division ignoring major philosophic and psychological traditions. Discusses the individual, social, and relational dimensions of morality and the cultural context of moral development. Calls for continuing narrative and…
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Cultural Influences, Decision Making, Evaluative Thinking
Paulston, Rolland G. – 1979
Traditional quantitative-experimental models of evaluation have failed to contribute to educational reform; they should be supplemented by qualitative-subjective models, which can be grouped under the rubric of naturalistic, or non-experimental evaluation. This naturalistic approach does not attempt to be value-free; rather, it recognizes that…
Descriptors: Classification, Conflict Resolution, Critical Thinking, Educational Change