NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siemens, Waldemar; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Rohe, Miriam S.; Buroh, Sabine; Schwarzer, Guido; Becker, Gerhild – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Using the Hartung-Knapp method and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) in random-effects meta-analyses is recommended by experts but rarely applied. Therefore, we aimed to reevaluate statistically significant meta-analyses using the Hartung-Knapp method and 95% PIs. In this methodological study, three databases were searched from January 2010 to July…
Descriptors: Cancer, Meta Analysis, Medical Research, Patients
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Prathiba Natesan Batley; Erica B. McClure; Brandy Brewer; Ateka A. Contractor; Nicholas John Batley; Larry Vernon Hedges; Stephanie Chin – Grantee Submission, 2023
N-of-1 trials, a special case of Single Case Experimental Designs (SCEDs), are prominent in clinical medical research and specifically psychiatry due to the growing significance of precision/personalized medicine. It is imperative that these clinical trials be conducted, and their data analyzed, using the highest standards to guard against threats…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Research Design, Data Analysis, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weber, Frank; Knapp, Guido; Glass, Änne; Kundt, Günther; Ickstadt, Katja – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
There exists a variety of interval estimators for the overall treatment effect in a random-effects meta-analysis. A recent literature review summarizing existing methods suggested that in most situations, the Hartung-Knapp/Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method was preferable. However, a quantitative comparison of those methods in a common simulation study…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Computation, Intervals, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Günhan, Burak Kürsad; Röver, Christian; Friede, Tim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Meta-analyses of clinical trials targeting rare events face particular challenges when the data lack adequate numbers of events for all treatment arms. Especially when the number of studies is low, standard random-effects meta-analysis methods can lead to serious distortions because of such data sparsity. To overcome this, we suggest the use of…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Medical Research, Drug Therapy, Bayesian Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Langan, Dean; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Simmonds, Mark – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Random-effects meta-analysis methods include an estimate of between-study heterogeneity variance. We present a systematic review of simulation studies comparing the performance of different estimation methods for this parameter. We summarise the performance of methods in relation to estimation of heterogeneity and of the overall effect estimate,…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Simulation, Comparative Analysis, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Torgerson, Carole J.; Torgerson, David J.; Birks, Yvonne F.; Porthouse, Jill – British Educational Research Journal, 2005
Health care and educational trials face similar methodological challenges. Methodological reviews of health care trials have shown that a significant proportion have methodological flaws. Whether or not educational trials have a similar proportion of poor-quality trials is unknown. The authors undertook a methodological comparison between health…
Descriptors: Intervals, Sample Size, Statistical Significance, Medical Research