NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Julia Brochey-Taylor; Joseph A. Taylor – Educational Research and Reviews, 2024
The purpose of this synthesis study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST) and its variations across multiple studies, aiming to understand limitations and propose modifications for future application within and beyond the science domain. Given the existence of multiple DAST versions, this study quantified…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Freehand Drawing, Personality Measures, Projective Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ferguson, Sarah L.; Lezotte, Stephanie M. – School Science and Mathematics, 2020
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined recent articles that have used the 1995 Draw-A-Scientist Checklist (DAST-C). This study was focused on the current state of students' stereotypes of scientists and the appropriateness of the DAST-C as a tool to assess these perceptions. Articles included in the review were published between 2003…
Descriptors: Projective Measures, Cognitive Tests, Personality Measures, Freehand Drawing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miller, David I.; Nolla, Kyle M.; Eagly, Alice H.; Uttal, David H. – Child Development, 2018
This meta-analysis, spanning 5 decades of Draw-A-Scientist studies, examined U.S. children's gender-science stereotypes linking science with men. These stereotypes should have weakened over time because women's representation in science has risen substantially in the United States, and mass media increasingly depict female scientists. Based on 78…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Sex Stereotypes, Gender Differences, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chang, Hsin-Yi; Lin, Tzung-Jin; Lee, Min-Hsien; Lee, Silvia Wen-Yu; Lin, Tzu-Chiang; Tan, Aik-Ling; Tsai, Chin-Chung – Studies in Science Education, 2020
In this study, we reviewed 76 journal articles on employing drawing assessment as a research tool in science education. Findings from the systematic review suggest four justifications for using drawing as a type of research tool, including assessment via drawing as (a) an alternative method considering young participants' verbal or writing…
Descriptors: Science Education, Formative Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Motta, Robert W.; And Others – School Psychology Quarterly, 1993
Notes widespread use of human figure drawings to describe and predict psychological functioning. Reviews data-based studies on figure drawings and concludes that there is little support for their validity or for their use as devices to assess personality, behavior, emotion, or intellectual functioning. Presents ease of administration and anecdotal…
Descriptors: Childrens Art, Evaluation Methods, Freehand Drawing, Personality Traits
Burgess, Ann W.; Hartman, Carol R. – Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 1993
This paper reviews the literature on projective drawing tests and child sexual abuse, focusing on children's drawings as an associative tool for memory. The use of the event drawing series, which is a series of seven drawings by a child that graphically present the child's thinking about a specific event, is discussed. (JDD)
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Childrens Art, Evaluation Methods, Freehand Drawing