Descriptor
Debate | 2 |
Evaluative Thinking | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Persuasive Discourse | 2 |
Communication Research | 1 |
Communication Skills | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Court Litigation | 1 |
Court Role | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Fadely, Dean | 1 |
Himes, Kenneth G. | 1 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Himes, Kenneth G. – 1983
Debate paradigms, which at one time established standards to help judges evaluate arguments and rules to guide debaters' argument choice and strategy selection, no longer offer consistent guidance for either judges or debaters. An increased emphasis on creativity and flexibility has led to a general unwillingness to use a rigid debate format. The…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Communication Skills, Debate, Evaluation Criteria
Fadely, Dean – 1982
College debaters who go to law school are often surprised by the differences between the processes that take place in the court of reason and the process that takes place in the court of law. The court of reason relies mainly on authoritative testimony, while the court of law relies on direct evidence. Evidence in the court of reason is either…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation, Court Role, Debate