Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Acceleration (Education) | 2 |
School Entrance Age | 2 |
Academically Gifted | 1 |
Admission Criteria | 1 |
Age | 1 |
College Attendance | 1 |
Early Admission | 1 |
Gender Issues | 1 |
Gifted | 1 |
Guidelines | 1 |
Intelligence Quotient | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Roeper Review | 2 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 2 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Culross, Rita R.; Jolly, Jennifer L.; Winkler, Daniel – Roeper Review, 2013
This article revisits the 1986 Feldhusen, Proctor, and Black recommendations on grade skipping. These recommendations originally appeared as 12 guidelines. In this article, the guidelines are grouped into three general categories: how to screen accelerant candidates, how to engage with the adults in the acceleration process (e.g., teachers,…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Acceleration (Education), School Entrance Age, College Attendance

Proctor, Theron B.; And Others – Roeper Review, 1988
This article analyzes why schools fail to provide for early admission of intellectually advanced children. Reasons cited include misinterpretation of research findings, bias of school personnel, expense of screening, convenience of administering a uniform entrance age procedure, etc. Benefits accruing from early admission are discussed. (JDD)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Acceleration (Education), Admission Criteria, Early Admission