NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education Amendments 19741
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 184 results Save | Export
Bakken, Jeffrey P.; Simpson, Cynthia G. – Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Ltd, 2011
The "Survival Guide for New Faculty Members: Outlining the Keys to Success for Promotion and Tenure" provides new faculty members with practical, down-to-earth wisdom and suggestions for successfully working through to tenure and promotion. The authors--both successful and experienced administrators and experts in higher education--have provided…
Descriptors: Guides, Higher Education, Tenure, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martin, Thomas P.; And Others – Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 1986
If athletics is structured, administered, and evaluated according to its educational function and value, there should be little conflict between the role of teacher and the role of coach. In addition, coaches should be evaluated using the same criteria that are used to evaluate teaching. This article presents guidelines for doing so. (MT)
Descriptors: Athletic Coaches, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mundy, Victoria; Grabau, Larry J. – Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 1999
Reviews literature that describes the benefits of peer review. Examines the steps for implementing departmental peer review programs. (Author/CCM)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yowell, Bob – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Considers the similarities between teaching and directing and offers suggestions for evaluating play directors. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cooke, Thomas P. – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Discusses the difficulties inherent in evaluating the director's work since it combines teaching and artistic aspects. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Elliott, Eddie M.
Objectives and processes for evaluation of faculty and nonacademic administrators are presented. The objectives include: (1) increase the opportunities for open communication between supervisor and supervised; (2) provide written role expectations; (3) provide a means of assessing and evaluating the degree to which expectations are met; (4)…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Welch, Betty Jo – ACA Bulletin, 1986
Examines a faculty development program that is based on management by objectives. (Includes forms or outlines for making recommendations for reappointment, promotion, or tenure; a development plan for the academic year; and a faculty performance review and development report.) (PD)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Hickson, Mark – Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 1985
Focuses on the annual faculty review by the department head. Suggests how this procedure can become more meaningful and includes a Performance Standards form. (PD)
Descriptors: Department Heads, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosenberg, Donald L. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews attempts of the academic theater community to develop a system to assess creative activity as a legitimate component for promotion and tenure decisions. (MM)
Descriptors: Creative Activities, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stine, Dick – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes and reflects on the faculty evaluation efforts of one midwestern community college. Examines some of the inherent differences between four-year and two-year institutions. Supports the use of formative faculty evaluation. (MM)
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Byrnes, Heidi – ADFL Bulletin, 1994
Ways are discussed for making faculty assessment an integral part of a department. Suggestions relate to developing career plans, specifying goals, identifying skills, conducting regular reviews, and locating assessment within the departmental and institutional culture. Guidelines and procedures are illustrated with sample letters and third-year…
Descriptors: Department Heads, Departments, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Terenzini, Patrick T. – ADE Bulletin, 1993
Provides a working definition for assessment as it relates to higher education. Contrasts what assessment should be with what it should not be. Gives several suggestions for administrators just beginning assessment activities. (HB)
Descriptors: English Curriculum, English Departments, English Instruction, Faculty Evaluation
Andersen, Dale G. – 1989
A model for the systematic assessment of the performance of college faculty members developed from work at Washington State University and the University of Nevada is presented. Matrices for scoring performance, activities, and achievements in the areas of teaching, scholarly activities, and service are provided. An illustrative scoring protocol…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Reppert, James E. – 2001
All institutions of higher learning have slightly different techniques of promoting and tenuring their faculty. The author compiled this document to provide resourceful pointers to future Broadcast Journalism and Mass Communication professors in the writing and organization of their applications. This collection of materials traces one tenured…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Employment Qualifications, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Arreola, Raoul A. – Engineering Education, 1979
Presents a variety of examples for developing a faculty evaluation system and gathering data about faculty members' activities. An equation is given that can be used to compute merit pay. The system for evaluation is designed to promote individualization in many settings. (SA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Performance Specifications
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13