Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Seldin, Peter | 6 |
Arreola, Raoul A. | 4 |
McIntire, Ronald G. | 3 |
Wong, Martha J. | 3 |
Diamond, Robert M. | 2 |
Franklin, Jennifer | 2 |
Kimble, Gregory A. | 2 |
Lowman, Joseph | 2 |
Manning, Brenda | 2 |
Peterson, Kenneth D. | 2 |
Richlin, Laurie | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Location
Australia | 3 |
Canada | 2 |
United Kingdom | 2 |
Africa | 1 |
Alabama | 1 |
Costa Rica | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
New York | 1 |
United States | 1 |
West Virginia | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education Amendments 1974 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Siegel, Laurence – Engineering Education, 1979
A task profile for faculty evaluation, generated by the Psychology Department at Louisiana State University, is explained in this article. Peer review is emphasized. (SA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Performance Specifications

Nowell, Lucy – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Discusses the tenure evaluation guidelines developed by the United States Institute for Theatre Technology (USITT). Expresses concern over the widening split between theater technologists and the actors, directors, and designers they support. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Trotter, Pat; Risdon, Penny – CUPA Journal, 1990
Performance counseling with college faculty is advocated as a humanistic approach to faculty evaluation. Discussed are performance goals, the delineation of professional competencies necessary to reach those goals, and factors affecting performance of faculty members. (DB)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Counseling, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
ADE Bulletin, 2002
Presents guidelines that deal with digital media and the hiring, reappointment, tenure, and promotion processes. Notes that these guidelines are designed to help departments and faculty members implement effective evaluation procedures. Concludes when institutions seek work with digital media, and faculty members express interest in it, the…
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Computer Uses in Education, English Departments, Faculty Evaluation

Hays, Robert G. – Journalism Educator, 1990
Presents a round-robin technique (in which each faculty member is evaluated by all the others in a single session) developed by a small, highly specialized faculty group to meet a new peer evaluation requirement. Notes that this technique does not require classroom observation, but still provides comprehensive and useful critiques. (SR)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Whitmore, Jon – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Presents recommendations of the Association for Theatre in Higher Education Task Force, addressing the issue of faculty workload. Suggests several questions to form the basis for discussions on this issue. (MM)
Descriptors: Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Workload

Schwartz, Donald F. – Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1988
Shares Cornell University's efforts to work with faculty on the problem of reports that anticipate departmental and faculty data needed during the year. (MS)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrator Role, Annual Reports, Department Heads
Jones, Ermil – Executive Educator, 1982
Suggests guidelines for evaluating department heads in elementary and secondary schools, especially heads who teach. Recommends getting teacher ratings and department head self-appraisals on 12 specific job tasks, as well as requiring monthly reports from the head to the principal and observing the head's normal job activities. (RW)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Administrator Evaluation, Department Heads, Elementary Secondary Education
Horine, Larry – Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 1981
Due to budgetary restraints, two major tasks confronting the physical education profession are: (1) to increase the overall productivity of the staff; and (2) to identify and weed out nonproductive faculty. An evaluative instrument is presented which measures nonteaching performance in a university department. (JN)
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Barbato, Carole A. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses what scholarship of integration is (interpreting, drawing together, and bringing new insight to bear on original research); what activities constitute such scholarship; examples from the field of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Rubin, Alan M. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses concerns with Ernest Boyer's redefinitions of what scholarship is. Argues the need for fair and consistent application of assessment standards for scholarship but notes problems of consistency and quality of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Shelton, Michael W. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses the Carnegie Foundation's 1997 report, "Scholarship Assessed." Offers an overview of the text itself, and discusses the centrality of discourse and argument to the work. Discusses implications for…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Svinicki, Marilla D.; Menges, Robert J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996
Good programs for recognizing exemplary college teaching are consistent with institutional mission and values, are grounded in research-based competencies and practices, recognize all significant facets of instruction, reward both collaborative and individual achievements, neither preclude nor replace the institutional reward system, call on those…
Descriptors: Awards, College Instruction, Educational Quality, Faculty Evaluation

Franke, Ann H. – Academe, 2001
Asserts that for universities to avoid the growing possibility of lawsuits, tenure evaluation procedures must be clear and fair. Provides suggestions to reduce the likelihood of litigation and to increase the institution's chance of success in a lawsuit. (EV)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Evaluation Problems, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation
Cashin, William E. – 1996
This paper discusses the principles of an effective faculty evaluation system that are repeatedly recommended in the literature. These principles include the following: (1) clarify institutional goals; (2) decide on the purposes of the data to be collected; (3) use pilot programs when appropriate; (4) significantly involve participants in the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development