Descriptor
| Faculty Evaluation | 8 |
| Higher Education | 8 |
| Theater Arts | 8 |
| Tenure | 5 |
| Faculty Promotion | 4 |
| College Faculty | 3 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Teacher Evaluation | 2 |
| Administrator Responsibility | 1 |
| Budgeting | 1 |
| Career Planning | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACA Bulletin | 6 |
| Stage of the Art | 1 |
Author
| Cooke, Thomas P. | 1 |
| Grady, Sharon | 1 |
| Nowell, Lucy | 1 |
| Robinette, Dan | 1 |
| Rosenberg, Donald L. | 1 |
| Whitmore, Jon | 1 |
| Whitmore, Jon, Ed. | 1 |
| Yowell, Bob | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 8 |
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedYowell, Bob – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Considers the similarities between teaching and directing and offers suggestions for evaluating play directors. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewedCooke, Thomas P. – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Discusses the difficulties inherent in evaluating the director's work since it combines teaching and artistic aspects. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewedRosenberg, Donald L. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews attempts of the academic theater community to develop a system to assess creative activity as a legitimate component for promotion and tenure decisions. (MM)
Descriptors: Creative Activities, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewedNowell, Lucy – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Discusses the tenure evaluation guidelines developed by the United States Institute for Theatre Technology (USITT). Expresses concern over the widening split between theater technologists and the actors, directors, and designers they support. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedWhitmore, Jon – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Presents recommendations of the Association for Theatre in Higher Education Task Force, addressing the issue of faculty workload. Suggests several questions to form the basis for discussions on this issue. (MM)
Descriptors: Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewedGrady, Sharon – Stage of the Art, 1999
Synthesizes the central themes from a session on how theatre educators can survive in academia which took place at the 1998 AATE (American Alliance for Theatre and Education) conference. Presents the "Top Ten Suggestions for Surviving in Academia," including the following suggestions: clarify what is expected, to whom faculty are responsible, and…
Descriptors: Career Planning, Collegiality, Employer Employee Relationship, Faculty Development
Peer reviewedRobinette, Dan – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes how Florida State University used the Salary Model, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare activities of one faculty member to others. Discusses several theoretical and pragmatic concerns that should be addressed when using the program. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation
Download full textWhitmore, Jon, Ed. – 1988
Based on a workshop for theatre department chairs, guidance on administrative and departmental responsibilities are provided in the following chapters: (1) "Chairs and Deans: Working Together" (J. Robert Wills); (2) "Faculty Evaluation" (Patti P. Gillespie); (3) "Evaluation for Promotion and Tenure" (James M. Symons); (4) "Production Program…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Budgeting, College Curriculum, College Faculty
