Descriptor
Source
CUPA Journal | 6 |
Author
Ames, Lynda J. | 1 |
Butterfield, Barbara | 1 |
Butterfield, Barbara S. | 1 |
Giunta, Celeste M. | 1 |
Hannah, Richard L. | 1 |
Pernal, Michael | 1 |
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 6 |
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 5 |
Practitioners | 5 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hannah, Richard L. – CUPA Journal, 1994
A study at one public university investigated the annualized rate of salary/wage increase of employees from the time of hiring until July 1992. It examined promotion patterns, equity adjustments, employee degree acquisition, and certification of clerical workers. The study underscored the wide variation in earnings growth rates due in large part…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Compensation (Remuneration), Data Analysis, Employment Experience

Ames, Lynda J. – CUPA Journal, 1993
A discussion of ways to remedy women's wage disadvantage in higher education looks briefly at affirmative action, then more extensive examines the principle of comparable worth, including advantages of implementing a comparable worth program, criteria for judging worth, bias-free job evaluation, and making comparable worth adjustments. (MSE)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Administration, Comparable Worth, Employed Women

Giunta, Celeste M. – CUPA Journal, 1998
Reviews the process by which California State University implemented a new systemwide classification and compensation structure for information-technology professionals in 1996, and describes the compensation structure, union negotiations, and lessons learned. The new plan features more flexibility, room for growth in job classifications and…
Descriptors: Classification, Compensation (Remuneration), Higher Education, Information Scientists

Butterfield, Barbara – CUPA Journal, 1988
The approach chosen to award pay for performance is not as important as the need to assess the organization's commitment to merit, the quality of the relationship with employees, and the ability to do a fair job. With careful implementation, merit pay systems can be mutually rewarding. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrators, Affirmative Action, College Administration, Employee Attitudes

Pernal, Michael – CUPA Journal, 1999
Connecticut State University has achieved success in recruiting and retaining information technology (IT) workers through six strategies: modifying the administrative structure to make positions and salaries more attractive; grooming students for IT positions; promoting benefits of university employment; transferring state civil-service employees;…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, College Environment, Compensation (Remuneration), Competition
Incentive Pay: A Plan to Recognize Major Contributions by Individuals, Teams, or Departmental Units.

Butterfield, Barbara S.; And Others – CUPA Journal, 1995
An incentive program that rewards and encourages desirable work traits can improve college or university effectiveness, customer satisfaction, and employee morale without excessive cost. Processes needed, benefits to the institution, costs, program design, challenges to successful implementation, and organizational communication needs are…
Descriptors: College Administration, Compensation (Remuneration), Departments, Higher Education