NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Evaluating the Teaching Component of the College or University Director's Work.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yowell, Bob – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Considers the similarities between teaching and directing and offers suggestions for evaluating play directors. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Priorities in the Evaluation of a Director's Work.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cooke, Thomas P. – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Discusses the difficulties inherent in evaluating the director's work since it combines teaching and artistic aspects. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
MBO: Faculty Evaluation and Development.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Welch, Betty Jo – ACA Bulletin, 1986
Examines a faculty development program that is based on management by objectives. (Includes forms or outlines for making recommendations for reappointment, promotion, or tenure; a development plan for the academic year; and a faculty performance review and development report.) (PD)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Evaluation and Artistic Vision: A Review of Progress to Date.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosenberg, Donald L. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews attempts of the academic theater community to develop a system to assess creative activity as a legitimate component for promotion and tenure decisions. (MM)
Descriptors: Creative Activities, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Faculty Evaluation at a Community College.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stine, Dick – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes and reflects on the faculty evaluation efforts of one midwestern community college. Examines some of the inherent differences between four-year and two-year institutions. Supports the use of formative faculty evaluation. (MM)
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
The USITT Evaluation Guidelines: How Do We Use Them? Where Do We Go from Here?
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nowell, Lucy – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Discusses the tenure evaluation guidelines developed by the United States Institute for Theatre Technology (USITT). Expresses concern over the widening split between theater technologists and the actors, directors, and designers they support. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Association for Theatre in Higher Education Task Force on Distribution Chair's Report.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Whitmore, Jon – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Presents recommendations of the Association for Theatre in Higher Education Task Force, addressing the issue of faculty workload. Suggests several questions to form the basis for discussions on this issue. (MM)
Descriptors: Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Workload
An Algorithmic System for Determining Faculty Salaries.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clevenger, Theodore, Jr. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes the Salary Model, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare quickly and easily the activities of one faculty member to those of other faculty member. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation
Faculty Evaluation for Salary Increases: A Computerized Model.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Padgett, Steven B. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews the Salary Model program, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare activities of one faculty member to those of other faculty members. Concludes that the program can be an effective tool in the evaluation process. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation
Application of the Florida State University Salary Model to Speech Communication and Theatre Department, Eastern Kentucky University.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Robinette, Dan – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Describes how Florida State University used the Salary Model, a menu-driven software package that allows administrators to compare activities of one faculty member to others. Discusses several theoretical and pragmatic concerns that should be addressed when using the program. (MM)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education, Faculty Evaluation