NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Calabrese, Marylyn E. – English Journal, 1982
Points out the disadvantages and limitations of grading all student writing. Offers alternative methods of giving students meaningful feedback about their writing. (RL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, High Schools, Teaching Load
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weaver, George E. – Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 1986
Advocates the simplification of marking papers by using a list of 10 guide numbers given to students before the writing exercises begin. (DF)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Business Education, Grading, Higher Education
Hunter, Madeline – Instructor, 1984
A mountain of paperwork can be pared to a molehill when teachers concentrate on diagnostic and testing techniques that minimize written responses. This article explains how to evaluate students in ways that emphasize oral responses, hand signals, and student grading of papers. (PP)
Descriptors: Assignments, Classroom Communication, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pearce, Daniel L. – Journal of Reading, 1983
Discusses the use of holistic evaluation, the use of rubrics and checklists, peer evaluation, and small group peer evaluation as means of making writing evaluation effective while keeping the paper load manageable. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Writing, Grading, Language Processing, Secondary Education