Existing choice plans, which allow parents and students to choose among a variety of schools, vary dramatically in size, shape, and purpose. Different types of choice programs have different impacts, especially on low-income and minority group students; and it is not yet clear how school choice programs should be structured to assure that those students with the fewest resources will not be shut out of the best schools. Reasons for the political appeal of choice plans include the following: (1) low-income and minority families can avoid poorly run and overcrowded urban schools; (2) free market, competitive principles are infused into a sluggish public education system; (3) individual families have more control over which schools their children attend and what services are provided; (4) a low-cost solution to problems in public education is provided; (5) pupil needs are better matched to school offerings; and (6) parent involvement may be increased. However, critics argue that many programs discriminate against poor and minority parents who are less informed about how the educational system works or are too overwhelmed with day-to-day survival to research the various educational options. There is a dearth of well-documented research on how school choice programs affect either academic achievement or educational opportunities. The following variations in choice programs are outlined: (1) controlled choice; (2) magnet schools; and (3) interdistrict and open enrollment. Recommendations for more equitable programs consist of the following suggestions: (1) a clear goal statement; (2) outreach to, and information and counseling for parents; (3) a fair, unrestrictive, noncompetitive, and equitable admissions procedure; and (4) provision of adequate transportation for students. A list of 11 references is appended. (FMW)