Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Adkins, Deborah | 1 |
| Cronin, John | 1 |
| Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
| Greenough, Richard | 1 |
| Kingsbury, G. Gage | 1 |
| Nelson, Steven | 1 |
| Sage, Nicole | 1 |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 2 |
| California | 2 |
| Colorado | 2 |
| Idaho | 2 |
| Kansas | 2 |
| Michigan | 2 |
| Montana | 2 |
| Nevada | 2 |
| New Mexico | 2 |
| North Dakota | 2 |
| Texas | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textNelson, Steven; Greenough, Richard; Sage, Nicole – Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest, 2009
Focusing on student proficiency in reading and math from 2003-04 to 2006-07, this report compares gaps in performance on state achievement tests between grade 8 American Indian and Alaska Native students and all other grade 8 students in 26 states serving large populations of American Indian and Alaska Native students. In response to a request by…
Descriptors: American Indians, Alaska Natives, Students, Grade 8
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests
