Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Accountability | 9 |
Federal Legislation | 7 |
Federal Aid | 6 |
Federal Programs | 6 |
Grants | 6 |
Low Income Groups | 6 |
Barriers | 5 |
Employment | 5 |
Employment Opportunities | 5 |
Food | 5 |
Income | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
US Department of Agriculture | 5 |
Early Learning Challenge… | 1 |
Education Policy Analysis… | 1 |
Peabody Journal of Education | 1 |
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 1 |
Author
Hartnack, Julie | 4 |
Mabli, James | 4 |
Hamilton, Gayle | 3 |
Schochet, Peter | 3 |
Carlson, Barbara | 2 |
DeCamillis, Mason | 2 |
Defnet, Amy | 2 |
Dotter, Dallas | 2 |
Freedman, Stephen | 2 |
Paxton, Nora | 2 |
Rowe, Gretchen | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Vermont | 9 |
Washington | 9 |
Illinois | 8 |
California | 7 |
Delaware | 7 |
Georgia | 7 |
Kansas | 6 |
Kentucky | 6 |
Mississippi | 5 |
Virginia | 5 |
Rhode Island | 3 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rowe, Gretchen; Mabli, James; Hartnack, Julie; Monzella, Kelley – US Department of Agriculture, 2022
The Agricultural Act of 2014 authorized $200 million for the development, implementation, and evaluation of pilot projects to test innovative strategies to reduce dependency on and increase employment among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. California, Delaware, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Mississippi,…
Descriptors: Federal Programs, Federal Legislation, Federal Aid, Pilot Projects
Mabli, James; Rowe, Gretchen; Hamilton, Gayle; Hartnack, Julie; Schochet, Peter – US Department of Agriculture, 2021
The Agricultural Act of 2014 authorized $200 million for the development, implementation, and evaluation of pilot projects to test innovative strategies to reduce dependency on and increase employment among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. California, Delaware, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Mississippi,…
Descriptors: Federal Programs, Federal Legislation, Federal Aid, Pilot Projects
US Department of Agriculture, 2021
The Agricultural Act of 2014 authorized $200 million for the development, implementation, and evaluation of up to 10 pilot projects to test innovative strategies to reduce dependency on and increase employment among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. The 10 States that received grants were California, Delaware, Georgia,…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Pilot Projects, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
Dotter, Dallas; Mabli, James; Carlson, Barbara; Hartnack, Julie; DeCamillis, Mason; Paxton, Nora; Defnet, Amy; Schochet, Peter; Hamilton, Gayle; Freedman, Stephen – US Department of Agriculture, 2021
This technical supplement to the SNAP Employment and Training (SNAP E&T) evaluation interim reports presents details of the authors' technical approach for creating analysis variables and estimating impacts of treatment group services on outcomes, including employment, earnings, and SNAP participation. It also describes the statistical…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Grants, Barriers
Dotter, Dallas; Mabli, James; Carlson, Barbara; Hartnack, Julie; DeCamillis, Mason; Paxton, Nora; Defnet, Amy; Schochet, Peter; Hamilton, Gayle; Freedman, Stephen – US Department of Agriculture, 2022
This technical supplement to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) evaluation final reports presents details of the technical approach used for creating analysis variables and estimating impacts of treatment group services on outcomes, including employment, earnings, and SNAP participation. It also…
Descriptors: Pilot Projects, Program Implementation, Cost Effectiveness, Barriers
No Child Left Behind and Administrative Costs: A Resource Dependence Study of Local School Districts
Neely, Stephen R. – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2015
This study considers the impact of federal funding on the administrative expenditures of local school districts since the passage of the No-Child-Left-Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. Under NCLB, federal education funds were made contingent upon a variety of accountability and reporting standards, creating new administrative costs and challenges for…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Expenditures, School Districts
Caron, B.; Kendall, R.; Wilson, G.; Hash. M. – Early Learning Challenge Technical Assistance, 2017
The Early Learning Challenge (ELC) program awarded more than $1 billion in four-year grants to 20 States to implement comprehensive and cohesive high-quality early learning systems that support young children with high needs and their families. A key lever in making these improvements was the enhancement of States' Quality Rating and Improvement…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Young Children, Student Needs, Quality Control

DeMoss, Karen – Peabody Journal of Education, 2003
Presents four case studies from Rhode Island (lifelong legislative deference); Washington (popular elections, judicial turnover, and case outcomes); Illinois (fighting changes in state ideologies); and Vermont (political aftermath of judicial decisions) which offer a sampling of the politics of court and state contexts involved in holding…
Descriptors: Accountability, Court Litigation, Disadvantaged Youth, Educational Finance
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs