NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marks, Peter E. L.; Babcock, Ben; van den Berg, Yvonne H. M.; Cillessen, Antonius H. N. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2019
In peer nomination research, individuals who do not provide nominations (nonparticipants) are often included on rosters as potential nominees. This can present ethical questions regarding informed consent, but psychometric consequences of excluding nonparticipants from rosters are unknown. In this investigation, Study 1 simulated both random and…
Descriptors: Peer Groups, Adolescents, Grade 7, Grade 8
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Choukas-Bradley, Sophia; Sheppard, Christopher S.; Prinstein, Mitchell J.; Abela, John R. Z. – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2019
Popularity and likability--two measures of adolescent peer status--have been examined frequently within Western cultures but relatively rarely within Eastern cultures. This study offered a cross-cultural comparison of adolescent peer status to examine whether these constructs and their correlates vary between the United States and China. The study…
Descriptors: Cross Cultural Studies, Social Status, Peer Acceptance, Asian Culture
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leets, Laura; Sunwolf – Journal of Moral Education, 2005
This study identified and described adolescents' exclusion rules and how they were related to their real world exclusionary behaviours. Adolescents (N=682) were asked to provide (a) an account and rationale for excluding a peer who wanted to join their group; and (b) general rules for when exclusion was fair. A content analysis of the narratives…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Social Isolation, Content Analysis, Peer Groups