Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Business Administration… | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Ethnicity | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| French | 1 |
| Gender Bias | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Pharmacy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Author
| Pitt, Edd | 1 |
| Winstone, Naomi | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPitt, Edd; Winstone, Naomi – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Anonymity in marking is a contentious issue within higher education. Conflicting research findings have identified issues surrounding gender bias, ethnicity bias and fairness in marking. However, the effects of anonymity upon feedback mechanisms have not been systematically explored. This study sought to understand the effects of anonymous marking…
Descriptors: Grading, Student Attitudes, Feedback (Response), Gender Bias
