Descriptor
| International Relations | 1 |
| Nuclear Warfare | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Public Policy | 1 |
| Rhetoric | 1 |
| Rhetorical Criticism | 1 |
| Validity | 1 |
Source
| Journal of the American… | 1 |
Author
| Dauber, Cori E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| USSR | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDauber, Cori E. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1988
Examines the way competing interpretations of evidence form the basis for arguments over appropriate defense postures. Indicates that it is only as participants in a policy dispute move to develop validity standards appropriate to the particular dispute that resolution becomes possible. (MS)
Descriptors: International Relations, Nuclear Warfare, Persuasive Discourse, Public Policy
