Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Antisocial Behavior | 1 |
| Committees | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Discipline Policy | 1 |
| Discipline Problems | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Institutional Characteristics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Pedagogical… | 1 |
Author
| Koçyigit, Mehmet | 1 |
| Çetinkaya, Ugur | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textÇetinkaya, Ugur; Koçyigit, Mehmet – Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2020
The aim of this study is to examine the records of secondary education institutions' disciplinary committee decisions, and to put forth the reasons why high school students are punished, and which punishments are given. The distribution of these punishments in terms of students' grade, school type and gender is also explored in the study. In this…
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Discipline Problems, Antisocial Behavior, High School Students
