Purpose: Kinematic measurements of speech have demonstrated some success in automatic detection of early symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In this study, we examined how the region of symptom onset (bulbar vs. spinal) affects the ability of data-driven models to detect ALS. Method: We used a correlation structure of articulatory movements combined with a machine learning model (i.e., artificial neural network) to detect differences between people with ALS and healthy controls. The performance of this system was evaluated separately for participants with bulbar onset and spinal onset to examine how region of onset affects classification performance. We then performed a regression analysis to examine how different severity measures and region of onset affects model performance. Results: The proposed model was significantly more accurate in classifying the bulbar-onset participants, achieving an area under the curve of 0.809 relative to the 0.674 achieved for spinal-onset participants. The regression analysis, however, found that differences in classifier performance across participants were better explained by their speech performance (intelligible speaking rate), and no significant differences were observed based on region of onset when intelligible speaking rate was accounted for. Conclusions: Although we found a significant difference in the model's ability to detect ALS depending on the region of onset, this disparity can be primarily explained by observable differences in speech motor symptoms. Thus, when the severity of speech symptoms (e.g., intelligible speaking rate) was accounted for, symptom onset location did not affect the proposed computational model's ability to detect ALS.