Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Writing Evaluation | 1 |
| Writing Improvement | 1 |
| Writing Instruction | 1 |
| Writing Skills | 1 |
Source
| College Teaching | 1 |
Author
| Gashler, Daniel | 1 |
| Levitt, Cheryle | 1 |
| London, Julie | 1 |
| Tessier, Jack T. | 1 |
| Tessier, Lisa M. | 1 |
| West, Benjamin S. | 1 |
| Winters, Nancy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTessier, Jack T.; Tessier, Lisa M.; Gashler, Daniel; Levitt, Cheryle; London, Julie; West, Benjamin S.; Winters, Nancy – College Teaching, 2023
College faculty faces decisions about how to provide feedback on written work. We compared the quality of student writing and student impressions of feedback from both full and minimal markup methods. There was only one significant difference in the quality of writing or content between full and minimal markup. Students scored the functionality of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction, Writing Improvement, Writing Skills
