Descriptor
Standardized Tests | 3 |
State Legislation | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
Costs | 2 |
Disclosure | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Testing | 2 |
Access to Education | 1 |
Constitutional Law | 1 |
Copyrights | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Burns, Daniel J. | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
New York | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Burns, Daniel J. – Journal of Law and Education, 1981
Truth in testing laws are subject to challenge on the grounds that they invade federally protected rights and interests of the test-makers through the due process clauses of the Constitution and federal copyright protections. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education

Burns, Daniel J. – Journal of Legal Education, 1981
Costs and benefits of New York's Truth-in-Testing law are reviewed and related to constitutional issues and fairness to test-makers as well as test-takers. Besides matters of cost and test question availability, challenges to the legislation also involve issues of due process, equal protection, and infringement of existing copyright laws. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Entrance Examinations, Constitutional Law, Costs

Burns, Daniel J. – College and University, 1981
Arguments for and against disclosure of standardized test contents and answers, addressing issues of humanizing the testing process, equalizing educational opportunity, ensuring accountability, minimizing costs, ensuring fairness, and protecting test validity, are presented. (MSE)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Accountability, College Entrance Examinations, Costs