Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Mathematics Tests | 2 |
State Programs | 2 |
Test Results | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Articulation (Education) | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Cutting Scores | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Demography | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 1 |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
New Jersey | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wainer, Howard – 1994
This report is the beginning of a series that will examine the performance of the school children of New Jersey relative to the performance of other children in the United States and worldwide. The measure of performance used was the 1992 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) mathematics examinations and their linked versions of the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Comparative Analysis, Demography, Elementary School Students
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests