Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 5 |
| Peer Acceptance | 5 |
| Peer Groups | 5 |
| Friendship | 3 |
| Adolescents | 2 |
| Aggression | 2 |
| Preadolescents | 2 |
| Prosocial Behavior | 2 |
| Rejection (Psychology) | 2 |
| Social Status | 2 |
| Antisocial Behavior | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Cillessen, Antonius H. N. | 2 |
| Babcock, Ben | 1 |
| Goossens, Frits A. | 1 |
| Kaur, Kirandeep | 1 |
| Kaur, Shubhdip | 1 |
| Lee, Nikki C. | 1 |
| Marks, Peter E. L. | 1 |
| Olthof, Tjeert | 1 |
| Pronk, Jeroen | 1 |
| Sandhu, Damanjit | 1 |
| Sijtsema, Jelle J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 5 |
| India | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Center for Epidemiologic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarks, Peter E. L.; Babcock, Ben; van den Berg, Yvonne H. M.; Cillessen, Antonius H. N. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2019
In peer nomination research, individuals who do not provide nominations (nonparticipants) are often included on rosters as potential nominees. This can present ethical questions regarding informed consent, but psychometric consequences of excluding nonparticipants from rosters are unknown. In this investigation, Study 1 simulated both random and…
Descriptors: Peer Groups, Adolescents, Grade 7, Grade 8
Pronk, Jeroen; Lee, Nikki C.; Sandhu, Damanjit; Kaur, Kirandeep; Kaur, Shubhdip; Olthof, Tjeert; Goossens, Frits A. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2017
Contemporary research adopts an evolutionary theoretical perspective in which bullying is strategic behavior that is conducive to peer-group status enhancement. Within this view, a high social status (i.e., popularity) has been associated with bullying others, while a high affiliative status (i.e., preference) has been associated with defending…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Bullying, Social Status, Peer Acceptance
Sijtsema, Jelle J. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2016
In the current study, associations between individual and friends' direct and indirect aggression and depressive problems were examined. It was expected that social status would moderate these associations such that low-status preadolescents would be more similar to their unilateral friends with regard to indirect, but not direct, aggression.…
Descriptors: Preadolescents, Friendship, Aggression, Depression (Psychology)
Verkuyten, Maykel; Steenhuis, Aafke – Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology: an international lifespan journal, 2005
The present study examined ethnically Dutch preadolescents' understanding and reasoning about asylum seeker peers and friendships. The description of an asylum seeker was compared with that of a Moroccan and a Dutch peer. The findings suggest that asylum seekers were described more negatively than peers from the other two groups. Additionally, we…
Descriptors: Peer Groups, Preadolescents, Rejection (Psychology), Friendship
de Bruyn, Eddy H.; Cillessen, Antonius H. N. – Journal of Adolescent Research, 2006
The present study was designed to examine early adolescents' stereotypical descriptions of two types of youth who are seen as popular by their peers. Participants were 13- to 14-year-old early adolescents (N = 287). The results indicated that early adolescents distinguished two types of popular peers: a "populistic" (popular but not…
Descriptors: Peer Acceptance, Early Adolescents, Prosocial Behavior, Antisocial Behavior
