Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Attention Control | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Writing Assignments | 1 |
| Written Language | 1 |
Source
| Active Learning in Higher… | 1 |
Author
| Arts, Jorik | 1 |
| Dirkx, Kim | 1 |
| Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée | 1 |
| van Diggelen, Migchiel | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirkx, Kim; Joosten-ten Brinke, Desirée; Arts, Jorik; van Diggelen, Migchiel – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2021
Rubrics are often used as tools for criteria-based assessments. Although students indicate that they appreciate comments given as feedback which make reference to the rubric and provided in addition to it, there is little information on how this type of feedback actually differs from in-text comments with respect to focus, level, and function of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Scoring Rubrics, Attention Control, Student Evaluation
