Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Roberts, Maxine T. | 1 |
Squires, John | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
von Zastrow, Claus | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
California | 2 |
Florida | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Minnesota | 2 |
Rhode Island | 2 |
Washington | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
District of Columbia | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Pell Grant Program | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
von Zastrow, Claus; Roberts, Maxine T.; Squires, John – Education Commission of the States, 2021
State education data systems help policymakers use data to evaluate the impact of their efforts to improve education. By disaggregating the data -- that is, breaking it out by different student subgroups -- policymakers can ensure that their efforts address the needs of students who have been traditionally underserved in educational settings. Yet…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Student Characteristics, Data Collection, Barriers
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs