Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Office of Planning,… | 2 |
Educational Policy Reform… | 1 |
Exceptional Children | 1 |
National Center on… | 1 |
National Charter School… | 1 |
Author
Atchison, Drew | 2 |
Hall, Adam | 2 |
Hurlburt, Steve | 2 |
Lazarus, Sheryl S. | 2 |
Levin, Jesse | 2 |
Manship, Karen | 2 |
Stullich, Stephanie | 2 |
Thurlow, Martha L. | 2 |
Yamaguchi, Ryoko | 2 |
Basso, Alexander J. | 1 |
Evaul, Thomas | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Policymakers | 2 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Maryland | 8 |
California | 3 |
North Carolina | 3 |
Texas | 3 |
Arizona | 2 |
California (San Francisco) | 2 |
Colorado (Denver) | 2 |
Indiana | 2 |
Indiana (Indianapolis) | 2 |
Louisiana | 2 |
Maryland (Baltimore) | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
National Charter School Resource Center, 2016
In partnership with the National Charter School Resource Center (NCSRC), the National Association for Charter School Authorizers (NACSA) has been conducting authorizer assessments over the past six years. However, the correlation between high-quality authorization practices and charter school impact has largely been unexplored. This report uses a…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Formative Evaluation, Educational Quality, School Administration
Levin, Jesse; Manship, Karen; Hurlburt, Steve; Atchison, Drew; Yamaguchi, Ryoko; Hall, Adam; Stullich, Stephanie – Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education, 2019
Over the past 25 years, a small but growing number of school districts have implemented weighted student funding (WSF), a type of school-based budgeting system, as a way to increase school-level autonomy and flexibility and more equitably distribute funding among schools. In these districts, education leaders have implemented policies that…
Descriptors: School Districts, Institutional Autonomy, Budgets, Funding Formulas
Levin, Jesse; Manship, Karen; Hurlburt, Steve; Atchison, Drew; Yamaguchi, Ryoko; Hall, Adam; Stullich, Stephanie – Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education, 2019
"Districts' Use of Weighted Student Funding Systems to Increase School Autonomy and Equity: Findings from a National Study. Volume 1," is intended to provide both practitioners and policymakers with detailed information about the design, implementation, and outcomes of weighted student funding (WSF) systems in the United States. Findings…
Descriptors: School Districts, Funding Formulas, Educational Equity (Finance), Elementary Secondary Education
Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Hodgson, Jennifer; Thurlow, Martha L. – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2010
All students, including students with disabilities, must be included in state accountability systems as required by law. In April 2007, federal regulations provided states the flexibility to offer another assessment option--an Alternate Assessment based on Modified Achievement Standards (AA-MAS) for some students with disabilities. The AA-MAS is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Alternative Assessment, Outcomes of Education, Disabilities

Kleinert, Harold L.; Haig, John; Kearns, Jacqui Farmer; Kennedy, Sarah – Exceptional Children, 2000
This article analyzes how Kentucky and Maryland have addressed basic issues in developing alternate assessment for students with disabilities who cannot be included within regular state and local district education assessment and accountability measures. Issues include why they chose the formats, standards, and implementation systems they did and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Alternative Assessment, Compliance (Legal), Decision Making
Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Thompson, Sandra J.; Thurlow, Martha L. – Educational Policy Reform Research Institute, 2006
Historically many students with disabilities did not participate in accountability systems. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires that students in all targeted subgroups, including students with disabilities, have the opportunity to learn challenging material that is linked to content standards and to participate in statewide…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Special Education Teachers, Accountability, Special Education
Klawuhn, Raymond E.; Basso, Alexander J. – 1972
The American Management Association examined the feasibility of improving the effectiveness of educational institutions through business management principles. Target systems were the State Agency Executive Staff, the State Agency Division of Program Services, and two local districts each in Maryland and North Carolina. Each management team from…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administration, Administrator Education, Administrators
Evaul, Thomas; And Others – 1977
The Maryland Alternative Accountability Pilot Project is described and analyzed. First, the conceptual framework on which the project was based is presented. This includes the background and circumstances that provided the impetus, project goals, resource allocation, and project management. Each of the following phases is then briefly discussed:…
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Involvement, Competency Based Education, Curriculum Evaluation