Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Aldeman, Chad | 2 |
Mitchel, Ashley LiBetti | 2 |
Bailey, Tessie | 1 |
Doan, Sy | 1 |
Doyle, Daniela | 1 |
Field, Tim | 1 |
Guilott, Maria C. | 1 |
Hodgson, Jennifer | 1 |
Lazarus, Sheryl S. | 1 |
Nelson, Gena | 1 |
Parker, Gaylynn | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Louisiana | 9 |
District of Columbia | 4 |
Tennessee | 4 |
Arizona | 3 |
Florida | 3 |
Georgia | 3 |
New Jersey | 3 |
North Carolina | 3 |
Pennsylvania | 3 |
Rhode Island | 3 |
California | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Higher Education Act… | 1 |
Higher Education Act Title II | 1 |
Higher Education Act Title IV | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mitchel, Ashley LiBetti; Aldeman, Chad – State Education Standard, 2017
In early 2017, Congress rescinded two education regulations passed late in the Obama administration. The first regulation, which attempted to define and implement the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), received most of attention since states were busy planning how to implement the new law in the 2017-2018 school year. However the second regulation…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Educational Change, Accountability, Educational Legislation
National Charter School Resource Center, 2016
In partnership with the National Charter School Resource Center (NCSRC), the National Association for Charter School Authorizers (NACSA) has been conducting authorizer assessments over the past six years. However, the correlation between high-quality authorization practices and charter school impact has largely been unexplored. This report uses a…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Formative Evaluation, Educational Quality, School Administration
Ruedel, Kristin; Nelson, Gena; Bailey, Tessie – National Center for Systemic Improvement at WestEd, 2017
Similar to many states, the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) does not mandate the use of specific literacy screening or progress monitoring tools. LDOE sought a measurement approach that resulted in accurate and reliable information on student progress and outcomes, yet respected local control. This state spotlight presents initial…
Descriptors: Data Use, State Standards, Educational Improvement, Decision Making
Mitchel, Ashley LiBetti; Aldeman, Chad – Bellwether Education Partners, 2016
States, programs, and schools have long focused on the inputs of teacher preparation--the rules for candidates and the preparation programs they attend--because inputs were thought to predict teacher effectiveness, and because they were often the best option available. But in the early 2000s, policymakers began trying to evaluate preparation…
Descriptors: Teacher Education Programs, Outcomes of Education, Accountability, Program Effectiveness
Stuit, David; Doan, Sy – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2013
Many proponents of private school choice take for granted that schools won't participate if government asks too much of them, especially if it demands that they be publicly accountable for student achievement. Were such school refusals to be widespread, the programs themselves could not serve many kids. But is this assumption justified? A new…
Descriptors: School Choice, Private Schools, Educational Vouchers, Tax Credits
Doyle, Daniela; Field, Tim – Public Impact, 2013
Charter school boards enter into a critical bargain: autonomy for accountability. Compared with their traditional district counterparts, they operate with relative freedom in curriculum, hiring, budgeting, and other operational decisions. In exchange, they are held accountable for student performance in ways that traditional district schools are…
Descriptors: Educational Change, School Closing, Charter Schools, Educational Quality
Sorapuru, Wylene M. – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Federal legislation and educational programs such as "No Child Left Behind" (2001) and "Race to the Top" (2009) identify school leaders as one of the major catalysts to improving academic achievement. Increasing accountability demands call for replacement of the principal when adequate gains in student achievement are not met,…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Decision Making, Principals, Persistence
Guilott, Maria C.; Parker, Gaylynn – Educational Horizons, 2010
The "all children can learn" call to action made no exceptions when it appeared on the educational landscape, and educators began to shift their thinking to ensure that students with disabilities were challenged in academic achievement. Two federal mandates, not only No Child Left Behind (NCLB 2001) but also the Individuals with…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Disabilities, Special Needs Students
Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Hodgson, Jennifer; Thurlow, Martha L. – National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota, 2010
All students, including students with disabilities, must be included in state accountability systems as required by law. In April 2007, federal regulations provided states the flexibility to offer another assessment option--an Alternate Assessment based on Modified Achievement Standards (AA-MAS) for some students with disabilities. The AA-MAS is…
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Alternative Assessment, Outcomes of Education, Disabilities