Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Stimuli | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Visual Stimuli | 3 |
Attention | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Task Analysis | 2 |
Attention Control | 1 |
Color | 1 |
Conflict | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ellenbogen, Ravid | 1 |
Goldsmith, Morris | 1 |
Henik, Avishai | 1 |
Hershman, Ronen | 1 |
Meiran, Nachshon | 1 |
Yeari, Menahem | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Israel | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stroop Color Word Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hershman, Ronen; Henik, Avishai – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
It has been suggested that the Stroop task gives rise to 2 conflicts: the information conflict (color vs. word meaning) and the task conflict (name the color vs. read the word). However, behavioral indications for task conflict (reaction time [RT] congruent condition longer than RT neutral condition) appear under very restricted conditions. We…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Eye Movements, Color, Interference (Learning)
Ellenbogen, Ravid; Meiran, Nachshon – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011
The backward-compatibility effect (BCE) is a major index of parallel processing in dual tasks and is related to the dependency of Task 1 performance on Task 2 response codes (Hommel, 1998). The results of four dual-task experiments showed that a BCE occurs when the stimuli of both tasks are included in the same visual object (Experiments 1 and 2)…
Descriptors: Evidence, Stimuli, Attention, Experimental Psychology
Yeari, Menahem; Goldsmith, Morris – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
Is object-based attention mandatory or under strategic control? In an adapted spatial cuing paradigm, participants focused initially on a central arrow cue that was part of a perceptual group (Experiment 1) or a uniformly connected object (Experiment 2), encompassing one of the potential target locations. The cue always pointed to an opposite,…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Prompting, Probability, Attention