Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Review (Reexamination) | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Instructional Materials | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Medical Students | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Programed Instruction | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Indiana | 2 |
| Illinois (Champaign) | 1 |
| Illinois (Urbana) | 1 |
| Indiana (Indianapolis) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTullis, Jonathan G.; Fiechter, Joshua L.; Benjamin, Aaron S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Practice tests provide large mnemonic benefits over restudying, but learners judge practice tests as less effective than restudying. Consequently, learners infrequently utilize testing when controlling their study and often choose to be tested only on well-learned items. In 5 experiments, we examined whether learners' choices about testing and…
Descriptors: Testing, Review (Reexamination), Selection, Memory
FERSTER, C.B. – 1960
STUDENTS WERE PRESENTED 61 LESSONS BY MEANS OF SEMIAUTOMATIC TEACHING MACHINES. LESSONS WERE ARRANGED SO THAT EACH PARTICIPATING STUDENT STUDIED PART OF THE COURSE MATERIAL WITH A SINGLE REPETITION AND PART WITHOUT REPETITION. DATA WERE OBTAINED FROM TWO TESTS SHOWING TEACHING-MACHINE RESULTS AND ONE FINAL COURSE EXAMINATION. NO SIGNIFICANT…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Instructional Materials, Learning Processes, Medical Students
