Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
National Center for Public… | 2 |
Education Partnerships, Inc. | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Community | 2 |
Policymakers | 2 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Illinois | 5 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Johnston, Howard – Education Partnerships, Inc., 2012
Surprisingly, the debate over +/- grade systems seems to occur, largely, at the college and university level. Few middle and high schools seem to have taken on the issue, at least in any way that appears in the public literature. Other opinions suggest that it is the discriminating quality of plus/minus grading systems that make them useful. A…
Descriptors: Grading, Educational Change, Evaluation Criteria, Goodness of Fit
Hunt, John – International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 2006
Since the implementation of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2002, the impact upon America's schools has been signicant in many areas. In a positive sense, NCLB has caused schools and school districts to examine the performance and academic achievement of subgroups, often for the first time. This examination has certainly highlighted…
Descriptors: Educational Indicators, Federal Programs, Staff Development, Educational Improvement
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2006
The purpose of this state report card is to provide the general public and policymakers with information they can use to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2006" is the fourth in a series of biennial report cards. The report card grades states in six overall performance categories: (1) Preparation:…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Comparative Analysis, Performance Factors, Educational Improvement
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2004
This state report card is derived from "Measuring Up 2004," the national report card for higher education. Its purpose is to provide the public and policymakers with information to assess and improve postsecondary education in each state. "Measuring Up 2004" is the third in a series of biennial report cards. The report card…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Comparative Analysis, Performance Factors, Educational Improvement