Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Cronin, John | 2 |
| Dahlin, Michael | 2 |
| Adkins, Deborah | 1 |
| Auchstetter, Amelia | 1 |
| Bos, Johannes M. | 1 |
| Cassasanto-Ferro, Julia | 1 |
| Dhillon, Sonica | 1 |
| Graczewski, Cheryl | 1 |
| Kingsbury, G. Gage | 1 |
| Kitmitto, Sami | 1 |
| McCahon, Donna | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 3 |
| California | 3 |
| Illinois | 3 |
| Maine | 3 |
| Massachusetts | 3 |
| Minnesota | 3 |
| Texas | 3 |
| Colorado | 2 |
| Delaware | 2 |
| Idaho | 2 |
| Indiana | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Preliminary Scholastic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBos, Johannes M.; Graczewski, Cheryl; Dhillon, Sonica; Auchstetter, Amelia; Cassasanto-Ferro, Julia; Kitmitto, Sami – American Institutes for Research, 2022
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation and impacts of the Building Assets, Reducing Risks (BARR) model in its first year of implementation in 66 schools across the U.S. and to document scale-up progress during the Investing in Innovation (i3) grant period (2017-2021). The impact evaluation included 21,529 9th grade students…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Grade 9, Secondary School Students, Secondary School Teachers
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests
