Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Civics | 1 |
| Classroom Communication | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Controversial Issues (Course… | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| Middle School Students | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Social Science… | 1 |
Author
| Gronostay, Dorothee | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textGronostay, Dorothee – Journal of Social Science Education, 2016
Being challenged by opposing views in a controversial discussion can stimulate the production of more elaborate and sophisticated argumentations. According to the model of argument reappraisal (Leitão, 2000), such processes require transactivity, meaning that students do not only give reasons to support their own position (e.g., pro/contra…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Classroom Communication, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Debate
