Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Center on Education Policy | 2 |
Education Policy Research Unit | 2 |
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 2 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Regional Educational… | 1 |
SAGE Open | 1 |
US Commission on Civil Rights | 1 |
US Department of Education | 1 |
Author
Berliner, David C. | 2 |
Glass, Gene V. | 2 |
Nichols, Sharon L. | 2 |
Benson, Stacey L. | 1 |
Christine G. Mokher | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Kai Zhao | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Pei Hu | 1 |
Shouping Hu | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 10 |
Grade 8 | 8 |
Grade 4 | 7 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
High Schools | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Grade 11 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Georgia | 12 |
South Carolina | 6 |
Texas | 5 |
Alabama | 4 |
Arkansas | 4 |
Florida | 4 |
Kentucky | 4 |
Louisiana | 4 |
Maryland | 4 |
Mississippi | 4 |
North Carolina | 4 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 8 |
Adams v Richardson | 1 |
Brown v Board of Education | 1 |
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title VI | 1 |
Gratz et al v Bollinger et al | 1 |
Grutter et al v Bollinger et… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 3 |
Georgia Criterion Referenced… | 2 |
Georgia High School… | 2 |
Connecticut Mastery Testing… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pei Hu; Christine G. Mokher; Kai Zhao; Toby J. Park-Gaghan; Shouping Hu – SAGE Open, 2023
State policymakers in the United States have in recent years experimented with new initiatives to change the procedures used by public institutions to assess and assign academically underprepared students to non-credit developmental education (or remedial) courses. This study explores whether the most recent developmental education reform in…
Descriptors: State Legislation, Educational Policy, State Policy, Educational Change
Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, 2010
State-level initiatives on closing the achievement gap between white, African American, and Hispanic students are still in the early stages of development and implementation in several states. From these initiatives have come several new programs aimed at addressing all aspects that have been identified as causes for the achievement gap, from…
Descriptors: Evidence, Academic Achievement, Achievement Gap, White Students
Benson, Stacey L. – ProQuest LLC, 2010
This study examined the relationship between the implementation of No Child Left Behind and the achievement gap between African American and white students' eighth-grade math scores on the yearly-standardized test (Criterion Referenced Competency Test--CRCT) in Georgia. A descriptive research design was utilized to examine data obtained from the…
Descriptors: Achievement Gap, Report Cards, Research Design, Middle Schools
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Center on Education Policy, 2010
Georgia has made some changes in its testing program in recent years. As a result, trend data were only available for reading in grades 4 and 8 from 2006 through 2009, and only at the proficient and advanced levels. In math, data were only available for the high school level from 2004 through 2009. Achievement data for low income students were…
Descriptors: Achievement Gap, Achievement Gains, Reading Achievement, Mathematics Achievement
Nichols, Sharon L.; Glass, Gene V.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This paper presents the appendices to the "High-Stakes Testing and Student Achievement: Problems for the No Child Left Behind Act" report. It contains the following appendices: (1) Example of Context for Assessing State-Level Stakes Sheet--Connecticut; (2) Example of Completed Rewards and Sanctions Worksheet--Connecticut; (3) Directions…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Academic Achievement, Federal Legislation
US Department of Education, 2008
Six years after passage of No Child Left Behind and midway to the nation's goal of having students on grade level or better in reading and math by 2014, more data than ever before has been collected about the academic performance of American students and schools. Information in this brochure charts student demographics, achievement-to-date and…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, Graduation Rate, Federal Legislation, Reading Achievement
Nichols, Sharon L.; Glass, Gene V.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), standardized test scores are the indicator used to hold schools and school districts accountable for student achievement. Each state is responsible for constructing an accountability system, attaching consequences--or stakes--for student performance. The theory of action implied by this…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Academic Achievement, Federal Legislation
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
Williams, John B., III, Ed. – 1988
Issues concerning desegregation of U.S. campuses and federal regulation of higher education under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are considered in 12 essays. Titles and authors are as follows: "Title VI Regulation of Higher Education" (John B. Williams, III); "The Production of Black Doctoral Recipients: A Description of…
Descriptors: Black Colleges, Black Students, College Attendance, College Desegregation
US Commission on Civil Rights, 2006
On July 28, 2006, a panel of experts briefed members of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on the putative benefits of racial and ethnic diversity in elementary and secondary education. Four experts presented written statements to the Commissioners that assessed the social science literature on this issue. They also addressed whether or not…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Civil Rights, School Desegregation, Secondary Education