Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Active Learning | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Curriculum Development | 1 |
| Inquiry | 1 |
| Learner Engagement | 1 |
| Science Experiments | 1 |
| Science Process Skills | 1 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
Author
| Carroll, David J. | 1 |
| Fowler, Samantha R. | 1 |
| Guisbert, Eric | 1 |
| Wiseman, Emily | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textWiseman, Emily; Carroll, David J.; Fowler, Samantha R.; Guisbert, Eric – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2020
The advantages of active learning approaches have prompted national recommendations for the development of inquiry-based laboratories to replace traditional laboratory classes. However, there is little consensus for the most-effective implementation strategies. Frequently, a single inquiry-based exercise is incorporated at the end of a traditional…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Inquiry, Undergraduate Students, Science Experiments
