Descriptor
| Courts | 2 |
| Delinquency Prevention | 2 |
| Delinquent Rehabilitation | 2 |
| Rural Youth | 2 |
| Agencies | 1 |
| Community Programs | 1 |
| Community Relations | 1 |
| Correctional Institutions | 1 |
| Court Doctrine | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Court Role | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
| District of Columbia | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textANDERSON, DONALD T. – 1963
EFFECTIVE REHABILITATION AND TREATMENT PROGRAMS FOR DELINQUENTS REQUIRE CLOSE WORKING RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LOCAL, COUNTY, AND STATE AGENCIES. THE JUVENILE COURT IS THE KEY AGENCY BUT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE BECAUSE OF LACK OF SUFFICIENT AND SKILLED SOCIAL WORKERS. THE SERVICES OF PROFESSIONALLY STAFFED SOCIAL AGENCIES ARE PARTICULARLY LACKING IN RURAL…
Descriptors: Agencies, Community Programs, Community Relations, Courts
FELTON, JOSEPH B. – 1963
THIS PAPER STATES THAT THE JUVENILE COURT IS RELATIVELY NEW IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, THE FIRST ONE HAVING BEEN ESTABLISHED IN 1899. UNIFORM STANDARDS WERE DEVELOPED IN 1923 AND HAVE BEEN REVISED FIVE TIMES SINCE, BUT ADOPTION INTO STATE LAWS HAS BEEN SLOW. PHILOSOPHY OF THE JUVENILE COURT IS PERSONALIZED AND INDIVIDUALIZED JUSTICE. TO CARRY OUT…
Descriptors: Correctional Institutions, Court Doctrine, Court Litigation, Court Role
