Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Johnson, Karen E. | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Peck, Kyle | 1 |
Wise, John | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Audience
Location
Delaware | 3 |
New Jersey | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
District of Columbia | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Johnson, Karen E.; Peck, Kyle; Wise, John – Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic, 2007
In a survey of 30 Mid-Atlantic Region education leaders, improving the achievement of No Child Left Behind subgroups (low-income students, students with limited English proficiency, students with disabilities, and students in major racial and ethnic groups) was the top priority in Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey, despite concerns about the…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Disabilities, Academic Achievement
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs