Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Author
Alzen, Jessica | 1 |
Briggs, Derek C. | 1 |
Chattergoon, Rajendra | 1 |
Conn, Daniel R. | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Diaz-Bilello, Elena | 1 |
Johnson, Raymond | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Peck, Fred | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 4 |
Grade 3 | 4 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Colorado | 4 |
Georgia | 2 |
Ohio | 2 |
Rhode Island | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Hawaii | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Briggs, Derek C.; Diaz-Bilello, Elena; Peck, Fred; Alzen, Jessica; Chattergoon, Rajendra; Johnson, Raymond – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2015
This report describes the use of a Learning Progression Framework (LPF) to support the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) process. The report highlights a few common threats we currently see in the SLO process implemented at various states and districts, and offers the LPF as a possible solution for addressing these threats. This report was…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Educational Objectives, Academic Achievement, Elementary School Students
Conn, Daniel R. – Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 2016
Through educational connoisseurship and criticism, this study explores how labels based on standardized student growth affect a rural school in Colorado. While the educators express intentions to help their students to demonstrate academic growth and achievement, they also have concerns that focusing on growth might compromise the well being of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Growth Models, Rural Schools, Achievement Gains
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs