Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Freedom | 1 |
| Administrative Policy | 1 |
| Censorship | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Freedom of Speech | 1 |
| Moral Values | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Australian Universities'… | 1 |
Author
| Hoepner, Jacqui | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textHoepner, Jacqui – Australian Universities' Review, 2019
What do attacks on 'unpalatable' research reveal about academic freedom? When academic work is curtailed, this cherished yet misunderstood concept is undermined. Silencing based on moral objection -- rather than wrongdoing -- suggests academic freedom is more constrained than we believe. On paper, academic freedom is rule-bound, yet 'dangerous'…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Moral Values, Scholarship, Teacher Rights
