NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Cook, David P.; Steed, Kevin; Read, Chloe; Baysarowich, Renée; Redway, Tyler; Robineau-Charette, Pascale; Carnegie, Jacqueline – HAPS Educator, 2020
STEM-related educational outreach offers students enriching opportunities to become more familiar with science, in terms of how it relates to their daily lives and with respect to possible career paths that they might want to follow. At the same time, graduate student trainees providing that outreach act as important resources for elementary and…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Outreach Programs, Graduate Students, College Graduates
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kobryn, Nadia – Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 2015
The article studies the development process of medical informatics specialty terminology as the ground for further research into foreign countries' experience, including the Canadian one, of specialists' professional training in the field of MI. The study determines the origin and chief stages of the formation and development of the medical…
Descriptors: Information Technology, Medicine, Comparative Analysis, Specialists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Albert, Mathieu; Laberge, Suzanne; McGuire, Wendy – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 2012
This study empirically addresses the claim made by Gibbons et al ("The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies." Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1994) that a novel form of quality control (associated with Mode 2 knowledge production) is supplementing the "traditional" peer-review process…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Scientific Research, Quality Control, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rangachari, P. K. – Advances in Physiology Education, 2010
An active approach allowed undergraduates in Health Sciences to learn the dynamics of peer review at first hand. A four-stage process was used. In "stage 1", students formed self-selected groups to explore specific issues. In "stage 2", each group posted their interim reports online on a specific date. Each student read all the…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Experiential Learning, Undergraduate Students, Evaluation Methods