Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Costs | 1 |
| Emergency Shelters | 1 |
| Geographic Regions | 1 |
| Homeless People | 1 |
| Metropolitan Areas | 1 |
| Minority Groups | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Profiles | 1 |
| Research Problems | 1 |
| Risk | 1 |
| Sampling | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Field Methods | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGolinelli, Daniela; Tucker, Joan S.; Ryan, Gery W.; Wenzel, Suzanne L. – Field Methods, 2015
Studies of homeless individuals typically sample subjects from few types of sites or regions within a metropolitan area. This article focuses on the biases that can result from such a practice. We obtained a probability sample of 419 homeless youth from 41 sites (shelters, drop-in centers, and streets) in four regions of Los Angeles County (LAC).…
Descriptors: Probability, Homeless People, Emergency Shelters, Sampling
