NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Yi-Jui I.; Chen, Yi-Hsin; Anthony, Jason L.; Erazo, Noé A. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2022
The Computer-based Orthographic Processing Assessment (COPA) is a newly developed assessment to measure orthographic processing skills, including rapid perception, access, differentiation, correction, and arrangement. In this study, cognitive diagnostic models were used to test if the dimensionality of the COPA conforms to theoretical expectation,…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Grade 2, Computer Assisted Testing, Orthographic Symbols
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Angele, Bernhard; Tran, Randy; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2013
Readers continuously receive parafoveal information about the upcoming word in addition to the foveal information about the currently fixated word. Previous research (Inhoff, Radach, Starr, & Greenberg, 2000) showed that the presence of a parafoveal word that was similar to the foveal word facilitated processing of the foveal word. We used the…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Word Recognition, Vision, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Plummer, Patrick; Perea, Manuel; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Recent research has shown contextual diversity (i.e., the number of passages in which a given word appears) to be a reliable predictor of word processing difficulty. It has also been demonstrated that word-frequency has little or no effect on word recognition speed when accounting for contextual diversity in isolated word processing tasks. An…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Eye Movements, Context Effect, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Angele, Bernhard; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011
We used the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to test two hypotheses that might explain why no conclusive evidence has been found for the existence of n + 2 preprocessing effects. In Experiment 1, we tested whether parafoveal processing of the second word to the right of fixation (n + 2) takes place only when the preceding word (n + 1) is very…
Descriptors: Models, Hypothesis Testing, Evidence, Vision